Okay, I get that people are upset about the idea of changing Junior's character, but hear me out: what if this deleted subplot actually makes him *more* interesting? I mean, The Sopranos is all about exploring the complexities of human nature, right? Maybe this "revolting twist" would have given us a deeper understanding of his motivations and inner demons. Sure, it would have been risky, but sometimes risks pay off. It could have even elevated the entire series! I'm willing to keep an open mind, at least until I see the video. What if it's actually genius? 🤔

This whole thing reminds me of how my grandma used to tell these wild stories about her past, only to later admit she made them up. It's that mix of fascination and betrayal. You're drawn in by the narrative, only to feel cheated when you realize it's not true. I have a feeling this "shocking and disturbing" subplot is just a way to get clicks, playing on our nostalgia and love for the Sopranos universe. Don't get me wrong, I'm curious, but I'm also prepared to be disappointed. Maybe it's better to let sleeping cannoli lie.

The Last Encounter: Tony and Phil Leotardo Face-Off in a Final Battle of Wits

I’m so glad this plotline was cut. Imagine the outrage. Junior’s character was already walking a tightrope between comedic relief and genuine menace. To add another layer of “shocking and disturbing” would have tipped the scales entirely, potentially ruining the delicate balance of the show. Sometimes less is more.

Hold up. A "revolting twist"? Are we talking about Junior becoming a serial killer or something? Because that's the only thing I can think of that would be truly revolting. Any other disturbing subplots pale in comparison. Someone enlighten me! What are the theories?

The Sopranos Ending - The Final Scene Explained in a Way You’ve Never Seen Before